...every predictive language is inadequate to the essential, in truth to the hyper essentability, the being, being of God--consquently, only a negative (apaphaetic) attrucion can be used to approach Giod, and to prepare us for a silent intution of God... (73)

the family resemblence of negative theology, in every discourse, that seems to return in a regular and insistent manner to the rhetoric of negative determation, edneslley multiplying the defenses and the aphophatic warnings: this which is called X (for example: text, writing, the trace, ifferance, the hymen, the supplement, the haramachon, the paragon)... (75)

God's name would then be the hyperbolif effecty of that neativa--or all negativa, that is consistent in its discourse. God's name would suit everytthing that may be breached, approached or designatied, expect in an indrect or negative manner.. (76)

how to avoid speaking, from derrida and negativa,