4 am, again at aarons...house party...talked alot, watched rowing w. 4 serious rowers, the cant and the texhinque made some dukk renewed, made me want to watc hwrestling together

said to aarons gf some things i have been thinking about regards being the proof of the universality of the church,

been having a good time, happy and calm

a week to the gta ?!?!

need to finish a brown wedge on il stona and koons+poor wolfgang wrt the nature of artist/model--one of the arguements in court, was that it was nolt a legitmate mariage, because both of them used their sexuality as a process and a product, ie porn star can never have sex w/o it being a performance and an artist who uses his body as a tool is in c ahoots, like two con artists playing three card monte in their own personal red light district (thats such a mess, there are actually some ideas there that surround similar themes that koons has been working on 4 years (is his work weaker now that he is doing it for his kid--the eeyroe mirrors/easy fun paintings--but then the topiary sculptures are really strong-- can we make the distinction b/w art as bikographical intecessor vs art as commerical intercessor for biogparhical purpose, or more crudely, is the art that he made for wolfgang better then the art he made to pay the lawyers)


lawyers watcvhing hardcore in their office under the auspices of research, returning staters status from wife to whore--whore on two levels, whore because she is porn and whore because she is paid to sexually perform, and the humilation of watching another man watch while you are fucking his wife...the tension that fed the art reduced to a sort of pathetic spectacle...a moral lesson that returns them to a prtestant ethic (sex as punishment)

also rembrandt and saskia
(two more ideads that need to be fleshed out, rembrandt obv example)